North Korea Warns U.S.; Japan Cuts Ties
October 11, 2006
By CHOE SANG-HUN and THOM SHANKER
North Korea warned today that it will regard increased pressure from
the United States as a “declaration of war” that will be met with “physical
measures,” as Japan announced tough new sanctions against the
country.
The new, unilateral measures by Japan will bar North Korean ships
from Japanese ports, cut off all imports of goods from North Korea and
restrict the flow of travelers between the two countries, Yasuhisa Shiozaki,
Japan’s cabinet
secretary, told reporters, according to news services.
North Korea’s threats come a day after the United States picked up crucial
support from China, North Korea’s closest ally, which said that it would
support punitive sanctions in response to Sunday’s blast, although
not necessarily the measures the Bush administration is seeking.
In a statement carried by the official North Korean news agency,
the country’s
foreign ministry declared today that “if the U.S. keeps pestering
us and increases the pressure, we will regard it as a declaration of
war and will take a series of physical corresponding measures.”
And in a rare interview, the country’s number two leader, Kim Yong Nam,
told a Japanese news agency that president of the Presidium of the North’s
legislature, that a continued “hostile attitude” on the
part of Washington could prompt more nuclear tests.
“If the United States continues to take a hostile attitude and apply pressure
on us in various forms, we will have no choice but to take physical steps to
deal with that,” he said.
The statement issued by the foreign ministry said that the country was prepared
for dialogue or for confrontation, according to Reuters.
On Tuesday, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice sought to assure
Pyongyang that it did not face an attack, but warned that it now risks
sanctions “unlike
anything they have faced before.”
North Korea often issues dire and bellicose statements, and whenever tough sanctions
have been proposed has been quick to equate them with an act of war.
But in Seoul, President Roh Moo Hyun told the South Koreans to brace
themselves for a “prolonged” confrontation with North Korea.
Mr. Roh also called the North Korean claim that it has built nuclear
weapons because of American threats a ``gross exaggeration.”
``The threat to security the North Koreans are talking about is either
nonexistent or a gross exaggeration,” he said. ``It’s unclear
whether the North Koreans are deliberately exaggerating the threat or
they are ignorant.”
Members of the Security Council prepared to meet this morning to continue to
debate what type of sanctions might be applied. While China did appear to agree
with the imposition of steps tougher than any it has allowed in the past, its
representatives said the punishments might not necessarily be the harsh ones
that Washington was proposing.
“For China, we need to have a firm, constructive, appropriate, but prudent,
response,” said Wang Guangya, the country’s ambassador to the United
Nations. “There have to be some punitive actions, but also I think
these actions have to be appropriate.”
The United States, Britain and France all want a resolution drafted under Chapter
VII of the United Nations Charter, which makes sanctions mandatory and poses
the possibility of military enforcement.
While both China and Russia have spoken of the importance of taking
serious action against North Korea’s reported nuclear test, they
are traditionally against invoking Chapter VII and have not indicated
whether they would end their opposition.
The United States wants agreement on sanctions this week. But even
as the administration sought to push tough language into a Security
Council resolution, the White House expressed doubts about the capacity
of North Korea’s nuclear program, based
on evidence that the reported test had a smaller yield than expected.
Sanctions sought by the United States include international inspections of all
cargo moving in and out of North Korea to detect weapons-related material. But
that might prove difficult for China and Russia to accept, in part because their
coastlines and borders would be affected.
The diplomatic moves came a day after administration officials responded with
shock and outrage to an official announcement from North Korea that it had detonated
a nuclear device.
In an interview on CNN, one of a series of television appearances,
Secretary Rice stressed that “the diplomatic path is open” for the North, and
that giving up its nuclear program would “lead to all kinds of
benefits for North Korea.”
But she said the North’s decision to pursue its nuclear program meant that
it would face “international condemnation and international sanctions
unlike anything that they have faced before.”
The United States has imposed economic curbs on North Korea since the opening
of the Korean War in 1950, though President Clinton lifted a few of them toward
the end of his time in office, when relations seemed to be thawing.
Now, in its bid to tighten sanctions, Bush administration officials say, the
United States is pursuing a two-track approach: trying at the United Nations
to persuade other countries to cut off economic ties with the North, and using
American banking laws to punish banks overseas that deal with North Korean companies.
At the United Nations on Tuesday, Britain, China, France, Russia and the United
States, plus Japan, met twice to work out differences on the sanctions proposed
Monday by the United States. John R. Bolton, the American ambassador, reported
the group was making headway.
“I think there is convergence on many issues, more than I would have predicted
perhaps a day or two ago,” Mr. Bolton said. “That’s not to
say we’re there by any stretch of the imagination, but I’m
pleased by the positive nature of the discussions and look forward to
more progress tomorrow.”
Mr. Bolton said he had discussed the proposal for North Korean ports separately
with Mr. Wang, the Chinese envoy.
As for Russia, Mr. Bolton began the day complaining that Vitaly I.
Churkin, the country’s ambassador, had arrived at the morning session with no instructions
from his government. He said it had left “a hole” in the
conversations.
But after the afternoon session, he said Mr. Churkin had heard from
Moscow and was able to take part in the debate. “We’ll have some areas to discuss
there and he raised some issues we had not thought of entirely, but by and large
his comments were supportive,” Mr. Bolton said.
Mr. Churkin left without making any comment.
Mr. Bolton declined to discuss specifics of the talks but said one
amendment suggested by Japan — a ban on travel by members of the North Korean government — had
attracted particular support.
Asked if he would limit the American demands in the interests of
speeding the process of drafting a resolution, he said: “We want firmness and swiftness,
and I think we can have both. That’s our objective.”
In television interviews and briefings for reporters, Secretary Rice and other
officials reiterated past assurances that the United States was not moving toward
occupying North Korea or toppling its government.
She said the administration’s policy was still that the diplomatic
path would be multilateral, through the stalled six-party talks, and
not the two-way dialogue that North Korea has sought with the United
States.
But even as the administration sought to unify its international allies, there
were signs of fissures among Republicans over whether Washington should negotiate
directly with North Korea.
Representative Heather Wilson, a New Mexico Republican and former
Air Force officer who has played a leading role on national security
issues, advocated bilateral negotiations, within the context of the
six-party talks. “The idea here
is to open a path for this rogue regime to walk back from the edge of the ledge,” she
said. “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with straight,
tough talk with countries that are not our friends.”
In the administration’s quest for tough sanctions, much of the effort is
focused on China, Japan and especially South Korea, which supply most of North
Korea’s imports and investments. Indeed, South Korea has invested
heavily in the Kaesong Industrial Park, an economic enclave in the North
that employs thousands in factories that produce shoes, cosmetics and
other export goods.
The United States has tried, without much success, to get South Korea
to limit its involvement in the enclave, arguing that North Korean financial
institutions that are involved in it are also involved in illicit activities.
In the wake of North Korea’s latest nuclear steps, persuading
South Korea may be easier, American officials say.
The unilateral drive by the United States is likely to expand on existing efforts
that American officials maintain have already had a damaging effect on North.
Indeed, the sanctions may have propelled North Korea to walk away from negotiations
on its nuclear program and test a weapon, some experts say.
Now, with the enactment of American laws and executive orders after Sept. 11,
2001, new tools have become available, and they are likely to be expanded in
coming weeks.
Under the U.S.A. Patriot Act, signed into law shortly after the 2001
attacks, the United States labeled a bank in Macao, Banco Delta Asia,
as a “primary
money-laundering concern” and declared that any bank doing business on
American soil — virtually every big bank in the world — could
not do business with it.
Administration officials say the ban on Banco Delta Asia badly disrupted North
Korean activities, effectively froze the personal accounts of North Korean leaders
and sent a message throughout the international financial system that the United
States was prepared to do more.
Backing up that threat, President Bush has accused several North Korean trading
corporations of being involved in nuclear proliferation and missile activities,
often in conjunction with Syria, Iran and Pakistan. American officials have also
visited banks in Europe, Asia and the Middle East to tell them that dealings
with those entities could jeopardize ties with American banks.
The aim, according to Stuart Levey, under secretary of the treasury
for terrorism and financial intelligence, is to put the international
community “on notice
about a particular threat” and get them to voluntarily end their
dealings with North Korean entities.
Choe Sang-Hun reported from Seoul, South Korea, and Thom Shanker
reported from Washington. Contributing reporter were Warren Hoge from
the United Nations, Steven R. Weisman, David E. Sanger and Sheryl Gay
Stolberg from Washington and John O’Neil from New York.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company



